On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 03:10:51 -0500, "Fox C1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That link you sent doesn't do it? >It had lots of good information as far as I could see... Well, that's a positive thing, then. >The only thing lacking is TOTAL PREVENTION which - maybe it should be made >more clear, is not an addressable issue at this point. There IS no total >prevention, thus this discussion group which may somehow, somewhen come up >with an answer. AFAIK, the only "total prevention" for spam, at this point, involves only accepting mail from known, controlled, whitelisted addresses, or not having an e-mail address at all. And the first option still presents some element of risk. Ted _______________________________________________ spamcon-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.spamcon.org/mailman/listinfo/spamcon-general#subscribers Subscribe, unsubscribe, etc: Use the URL above or send "help" in body of message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
