Is it my imagination or has the size of spam greatly increased? Lately, instead of getting URLs to web sites, I'm getting HTML files with references to GIF or JPEG files that are attached to the message. The worst I got recently was 97K! How large does spam have to be before the federal government passes effective anti-spam laws?!
When such laws ARE passed, I think the penalties should be greater for those who send these large spam messages. For example, instead of suing to enforce a flat charge for each individual instance of spam (Re: that recent lawsuit in the Oregonian) it should have been a charge per kilobyte. Marjorie [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ spamcon-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.spamcon.org/mailman/listinfo/spamcon-general#subscribers Subscribe, unsubscribe, etc: Use the URL above or send "help" in body of message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
