>>Sorry, I remain unimpressed with the theory that government action is >>superior to industry self regulation. The beta test of your theory >>is simply not proving it to be a practical solution. > > If blocklists would use the self-restraint to regulate themselves > there would be no need for government action. Refusing to answer > removal requests does not constitue self regulation.
If blocklists removed on request they'd be worthless. If a blocklist offends its users, it ceases to have any and becomes irrelevant, hence there's no problem. So my questions are: 1. Specifically what do you propose as self-regulation for blocklists? 2. How do you propose a government (which government?) to regulate what I, or anybody else, may publish, that some third party chooses to use as a blocklist? Seth _______________________________________________ spamcon-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.spamcon.org/mailman/listinfo/spamcon-general#subscribers Subscribe, unsubscribe, etc: Use the URL above or send "help" in body of message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
