[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I also wonder: Since SC traced the origin to psi.net, why did it not use
> psi.net's date to determine that the spam is not too old?
SC uses the date of the first trusted received line. While it is not
common for the upper received line to be earlier than a lower line, it
is possible for spam to get caught up in cyberspace for several days.
It can also be assumed that the first trusted received is your mail
server, more likely to be correct than a spammers (rule #1<g>)
Richard
_______________________________________________
SpamCop-Help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-help
