"anonymous poster at 62.253.128.8" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Any non PaeTec people
> prepared to go visit and trip over a lead? - or a friendly electriciand
> to connect the server to 450v by mistake?
The courts don't take kindly to someone trying to get around a TRO, even if
that TRO is unconstitutional or just wrong. The reason 2600 magazine is
going to lose the MPAA vs. DeCSS case is that Corley tried to sneak around
the TRO.
Paetec would lose BIGTIME if they disrespected the TRO.
> btw is this PaeTec stuff for real?
It's likely that most of what PaeTec is saying is reliable. I don't buy
all of it. The "2% complaint ratio" contract addendum looks suspicious,
like they were TRYING to have a pink contract but the lawyers didn't make
it airtight. The landshark's arguments are particularly weak in dealing
with that issue.
_______________________________________________
SpamCop-Help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-help
