Sorry, I got lost going around one of those quick turns in your explanation. Unfortunately, I seem to be very dense in comprehending what is happening. A. What IS a silent report, and why are these sites not reported to (I know that some like ripe ARE a no-no, but the others - why not.) B. You say that the reports "should not have been sent" clarify the criteria used to not send the report. C. Any info re: the "IP block owner" (and what does this mean - is there a FAQ on this?) TIA "michael lefevre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 9d3u4o$84o$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9d3u4o$84o$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > "Anon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 9cvumv$hgn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9cvumv$hgn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I read all of the previous "won't send report" thread (which I had > started.) > > On reparsing the link, I get the following: > > Report already sent to: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Would send message source reports to: > > Re:208.147.127.119 (Administrator of network where email originates) > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Re:208.147.127.119 (Administrator of IP block - statistics only) > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > The last several lines confirm the *not sent* reports, but don't say why > > they were not sent. > > > > Again - still no explanation of the "silent" report. Does "silent" mean > that > > no report was sent but Julian's record keeping logs the fact that they > > *should* have been sent??? > > > > Following is a quote from the previous thread: "this is now fixed. I've > > been making some changes - note the new "IP block owner" silent reports. > > And introducing new bugs too, of course ;)" > > > > I don't remember anything about "IP block owner" (and what does this > mean - > > is there a FAQ on this?) > > ah... those reports weren't sent, and they shouldn't have been... > > the problem addressed by the threads was that when the usual source reports > and the new "silent" test reports matched up, nothing was sent... now the > usual reports are sent, the "silent" reports are not, because they're > silent, which is how it's supposed to be... > > i guess, depending on the results of the testing, the spamcop might one day > send those reports instead of the ones it does at the moment... > > michael > > _______________________________________________ SpamCop-Help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-help
