I checked out the papers Paetec entered in court and posted on their
website. From their account of matters it appears that MonsterHut got an
account with them and within a few days they were getting lots of
complaints about unsolicited mailings.
I have tried to check out whether I heedlessly left a "please send me"
box checked somewhere when I visited some site, because I don't want to
blame MonsterHut unfairly, but I couldn't find any such possibilities.
So I will be sending in my sworn account tomorrow.
There is a notary public at my bank, and the service is free. Paetec
provides a "fill in the blank" affidavit to which I have added an
account of how I tried to find a plausible explanation for MonsterHut
having my address.
Salocin wrote:
>
> I recently received an answer to a spamreport (which I'm sure several of you
> also received) from Paetec. It basically said that they were in the middle
> of litigation with MonsterHut, who were sueing them to stop termination of
> Internet Access for Spamming offences.
>
> They asked me to send them a statement, preferably in the form of a sworn
> affidavit, stating that I had never solicited any mail from Monsterhut.
>
> I sent them an Email detailing the points they needed, although I stopped
> short of finding a notary to make a sworn statement.
>
> Paetec have set up a website to detail their side of the case and their need
> for evidence : http://litigation.paetec.net/
>
> Spamcop is mentioned in the PaeTec memorandum of law in response to the
> temporary injunction they have had served upon them, as one of the major
> sources of complaints.
>
> Anyone else been receiving stuff from MonsterHut?
>
> Nicolas.
_______________________________________________
SpamCop-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-list
