"Jos� Lamas R�os" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
9d6npt$d63$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9d6npt$d63$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> [PROPOSED FAQ]
> Q: May I add other addresses (or the content of referenced web pages) to
the
> body of the spam so that it will be parsed by SpamCop?
>
> A: Definitely not. Doing that is against the rules. Spam submitted to SC
> must be unaltered.
I've seen a lot of little tips for altering spam lately....clipping
malformed headers, adding blank lines between header/body, snipping body
because it has too many links, snipping body because it's bigger than 50K,
etc.
Kind of difficult to list "allowable" tricks, huh?
You are welcome to use SpamCop to determine where to send
> a report about a "reply-to" address, but use one of the following options
in
> order to actually sending it:
>
> 1 - If you are a free user, send a manual report on your own, without
> mention to SpamCop
> 2 - If you are a paying member, use the "other addresses" box and write a
> note about why *you* think that e-mail address deserved to be reported.
> [/PROPOSED]
>
> Feel free to elaborate/refine/whatever ;)
>
>
That part is good.
_______________________________________________
SpamCop-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-list
