"Argyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Those "tricks" don't have anything to do with fooling SpamCop into
> reporting something that wasn't in the original spam. Big Difference!
>
> SpamCop is NOT going to condone adding the "Reply-to" address to the
> body of the text.
>
Ummm, Mr. D'Minion? I _know_ that. My point was writing the FAQ entry with
the statement "no altering is allowed". This is not a true statement. My
brain is too tired right now to come up with better wording. Caffination
cure is failing.
Indi (jlr *did* ask for comments) go
_______________________________________________
SpamCop-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-list
