Michael:

Thx for your reply.
I guess i will just wait for it to stop.

Meanwhile: spamdyke is by far the best tool i have seen and used to fight spam.

Thanks !!!
Pablo


2008/5/7 Michael Colvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I was in a similar situation a couple months ago when I took over service
> for another ISP that had been hosting it's domain with yet another ISP, who
> had poor spam filtering...
>
> For years, the domain I took over had likely been used for spam, either
> directly or through backscatter, the result, when I moved the domain was the
> spam bots followed to my server, which brought it to its knees.  SpamDyke to
> the rescue!
>
> As with you, SpamDyke performed perfectly.  It's been 2 months now, and the
> total number of connections has gradually decreased during that time.  I was
> at just under 1 million smtp connections a day, and am now down to around
> 500K, 99.4% of that is blocked by SpamDyke.  This percentage hasn't really
> changed much, but the quantity of attempts has.
>
> My guess is, as the "Spammer", or whoever was controlling the spam bots in
> my case, or spam bots as the case may be, is slowly figureing out that their
> spam is no longer getting out...That makes it unprofitable for them, and
> will make them go elsewhere...In my case, I think several people had used
> that domain to get their spam out, and, as time is progressing, they are
> moving on.
>
> My guess is, at some point, maybe even just initially, the person using your
> mail servers was successful, and now that you've blocked them, it may take
> them a while to figure out that they are no longer succeeding.
>
> Another thing I've noticed is that I feel one of their "Techniques" is to
> inundate a server with so much mail, that more common anti-spam
> applications, such as Spam Assassin, become overloaded and timeout, causing
> them to basically be Denial of Serviced.  I will occassionally see very
> large peaks of sudden attempts to send mail to my server.  Nearly all of
> them are denied by SpamDyke, so it has little effect on my server, but
> previous to SpamDyke, it would likely have bogged it down and gotten past
> SpamAssassin...
>
> Anyway, that's my .02.  I think you're just going to have to wait it
> out...It may take a week or so for the person to find another
> target...Hopefully, it won't be me.  :-)
>
>
>
> Michael J. Colvin
> NorCal Internet Services
> www.norcalisp.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pablo Medina
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 7:02 PM
>> To: spamdyke users
>> Subject: [spamdyke-users] OT: Spambot attack
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Sorry for this off-topic post. I am posting it because most
>> people on the list are mail server administrators. Also, it
>> is slightly related to spamdyke so i feel confident some of
>> you can be of help.
>>
>> On March 24, two of our mail servers, (phisically separated,
>> different countries and networks) started to receive a big
>> amount of SMTP connections. A quick check revealed that all
>> the incoming connections had a single account as recipient on
>> each server.
>>
>> As we are using spamdyke on both servers, i quickly added
>> that email address to the recipient-blacklist file and all
>> connections were rejected (DENIED_BLACKLISTED and others).
>> This decreased the load on the servers (as emails were not
>> being processed) and restored it to a functional state. But
>> connections were still there. I have seen before this kind of
>> spambot attacks, and , as all of those stopped sooner or
>> later, i was hoping it stop on the next hours. The main issue
>> is that the attack never stopped. We are receiving around
>> 950,000 connections to that account per day since 30 days ago.
>>
>> The stats for the last four days are:
>>
>> May 06   943.600 connections.
>> May 05   993.454 connections.
>> May 04   840.815 connections.
>> May 03 1.022.314 connections.
>>
>> Different IP address:      75238
>> Different class C subnets: 50074
>> Different class B subnets: 8936
>>
>> I have selected random addresses to check and IPs are from
>> different countries (most of them from Asia, but many from Europe)
>>
>> This makes impossible for me to contact each network owner to
>> alert about the situation. So right now, we are relying only
>> on spamdyke to control the situation. It is doing it's work
>> great, but i am very concerned by the fact that connections
>> never decrease nor stop.
>>
>> My question is: has anyone experienced this issue before?.
>> Any advice on how to deal with it?.
>>
>> Regards
>> Pablo
>> _______________________________________________
>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to