Olivier Mueller wrote: > I used q-s in the past, but had to drop it because of memory/cpu-use > issues... As far as I remember it was an huge perl script started on > every incoming mail: is it still the case? (better would be something > like spamd + spamc).
You can always substitute qmail-local by your own code (even bash script works like w/o no harm) which would scan the mail (i.e. by calling any external tool you wish), drop or bounce it if needed needed (virus?) or just hand over to original qmail-local to continue delivery. Works like a harm for years here and keeps perl away. Regards, -- "Daddy, what "Formatting drive C:" means?"... Marcin http://wfmh.org.pl/carlos/ _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
