Did you found the ips whois spamming your server?
Have a detailed log file?

Nightduke


2008/5/27, Bgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>  I think it would be better to put geoip in a reverse DNS setup.
> Doesn't need any special software. Just generate a reverse DNS file for
> tinydns (most qmail setups have it installed anyway). This way lookup
> caching is automatically done, no need to change spamdyke and the same
> system can be used for other purposes as well. The only change needed in
> spamdyke would be the geoip dns lookup which won't be a big hassle. (The
> DNS answer would explicitly contain the geo ip, AS, etc. info). If there
> is enough demand for it I can do the DNS part. Sam should be able to do
> a quick patch on spamdyke part if he agrees.
>
>
> Regards
> Bgs
>
> Peter Kieser wrote:
> > Would be interesting to see spamdyke support some kind of GeoIP
> > database, like Maxmind GeoIP:
> >
> > http://www.maxmind.com/download/geoip/database/
> >
> > -Peter
> >
> > Sam Clippinger wrote, On 5/23/2008 1:33 PM:
> >> These are all good ideas and each of them would be more efficient than
> >> blocking in spamdyke.
> >>
> >> Everything revolves around how you determine if an IP address is
> >> "non-US".  You need a list of IPs (or ranges) from somewhere.  Once you
> >> have that list, you can block them at the router, at the server's
> >> kernel-level firewall or in spamdyke.  If you only want to block by rDNS
> >> country code, you can just list those in spamdyke's rDNS blacklist.
> >>
> >> -- Sam Clippinger
> >>
> >> Bgs wrote:
> >>
> >>>   Hi,
> >>>
> >>> You can probably tune on the settings first I think. I had an Athlon XP,
> >>> 1.5GB, sata software raid1 server which topped at 8million spam/day. Of
> >>> course it was very loaded but still no lost mail. With your config and
> >>> ~1.1 million mail/day you should be ok.
> >>>
> >>> But to get back to your original question: There are multiple levels
> >>> where you can do it. Deciding which to use depends on the type of
> >>> filtering you'd like to achieve. Here are them from low to high:
> >>>
> >>> - Get a geoip db, get the US ranges and do a separate chain in your
> >>> firewall and whitelist those. update it about once a week. I use this to
> >>> block Chinese traffic on some servers. You'd just do the opposite.
> >>> - Patch the kernel and add geoip support and drop all non-us traffic to
> >>> your smtp port.
> >>> - Patch the kernel and do an AS based filtering. You will still need to
> >>> get the AS list.
> >>> - Similar to the above iptables chain you could do a similar thing from
> >>> tcpserver or ipvsd.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You could also set up some IP limiter which will block much of your spam
> >>> traffic while not blocking the non-us world in general.
> >>>
> >>> The ways of the Net are endless :D
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Bgs
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Kyle Quillen wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> When you say do it on the IP level what do you mean?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Well based on my spamassassin graphs it is about 8000 messages on a ten
> >>>> minute average.  spamassassin is what is killing me.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> Kyle
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 17:25 +0200, Bgs wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think you'd better do it on IP level.... much more efficient.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> May I ask how big is that traffic that causes the problem? mail/day,
> >>>>> cuncurrent connections, etc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>> Bgs
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kyle Quillen wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello all,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I am dealing a very high load on one of my servers and it is causing 
> >>>>>> all
> >>>>>> kinds of issues.  It is a qmail toaster box with 6 gigs of ram and
> >>>>>> quadcore 3.2 ghz processors.  What I am wanting to know is there a way
> >>>>>> that I can block all non-us ips in spamdyke?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> spamdyke-users mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> spamdyke-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spamdyke-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to