Sam Clippinger wrote:

> I'm not sure how to implement your second suggestion.  Specifically, I'm 
> not sure how to make it easily configurable.  Some kind of advanced 
> rules configuration would need to exist, so you could write a 
> configuration file that says: "If a message matches an RBL, graylist it 
> instead of rejecting it.  All other filters behave normally."  That's 
> probably a long way away.

The good old decision between: simple/fast vs. complex/slow. spamdyke's 
main power is it's simplicity. There is of course place for complex 
solutions as well, but I think that's wouldn't be spamdyke any more :)

Just my 0.02$


Bye
Bgs

> 
> -- Sam Clippinger
> 
> Daniel Snow wrote:
>> Hi!
>>  
>> I would have a wishlist for spamdyke, because it is a real gret 
>> software, and I plan to use it in all of my installations.
>>  
>> 1. It would be nice if I can quarantine everykind of message. I'm 
>> thinking of the messages denied by RBL lists for example. It is very 
>> rare that there can be false positives, but this feature would be very 
>> nice. If someone is looking for a mail, I can consult the logfile of 
>> course, but I can't get the message back for the user, which can be a 
>> big problem.
>>  
>> 2. For the lowering of false-positive messages created by RBLs, it 
>> would be nice if I could tell spamdyke to only greylist those, who 
>> come from an RBL, and if it passes the greylist-test, then let them in 
>> for further investigation (spamassassin, clamav etc.).
>>  
>> Thank you very much!
>>  
>> Daniel
>>  
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>   
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to