That's indeed the behavior I see with qmail-toaster. Spamdyke is still an add-on at this point, but will be included with the 'stock' system in the next major release.
Sam Clippinger wrote: > chkuser is just another filter that intercepts the data before qmail > sees it, so I don't see any reason it won't work with spamdyke. IIRC, > QmailToaster uses both chkuser and spamdyke. When chkuser rejects a > recipient, spamdyke should log it with "DENIED_OTHER". > > -- Sam Clippinger > > Youri V. Kravatsky wrote: >> Hello, people! :) >> >> Probably I've missed something, but there is any means to integrate >> qmail, spamdyke and chkuser (mine was with quotacheck)? I don't want >> to reinstall/replace qmail (well, 215 domains are hosted at this >> server). Right now all messages that have passed spamdyke are trying >> to be delivered, even to non-existant users/domains. It's very >> annoying (queue is loaded with junk for 1500-1600 messages >> permanently). I've searched in mailing list, but didn't found anything >> :( >> >> -- -Eric 'shubes' _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
