Jorge, I know that qmail-toaster (http://qmailtoaster.com) can block mail to invalid recipients. Well, it doesn't exactly block. It bounces, or deletes, or delivers to a catchall account. I'm not suggesting you convert, but you might have a look at it to see how it accomplishes this. I believe it's done at delivery time, with something in the .qmail file for the domain.
How is your catchall presently configured? -- -Eric 'shubes' Jorge R. Constenla wrote: > I'm going to change to the "config-dir" option in our servers, so that > each domain can set your options and integrating with our control panel. > > I'll wait the next version for "block mail to invalid recipients" feature. > > Thanks. > Best regards. > > Sam Clippinger wrote: >> I'm not sure what you're asking about Server Performance or Consuming. >> If you want to know if the "config-dir" option causes spamdyke to run >> slower, the answer is yes, but just barely. With that option enabled, >> spamdyke has to do more work to look for additional configuration files, >> but not very much. I haven't benchmarked it, but I doubt the difference >> would be measurable, even on a seriously overloaded server. >> >> At this time, spamdyke can't block mail to invalid recipients. That >> feature is going to be in the next version, which I haven't finished >> testing yet. As soon as I can find time to finish writing the test >> scripts (and fix any bugs they find), I'll release it. >> _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
