It depends, is Qmail using a different cert than Spamdyke is? When you say you're doing TLS directly in Qmail, I'm assuming that you're using a Qmail that has the Qmail-TLS patch applied? http://inoa.net/qmail-tls/
Qmail-TLS appears to use $QMAILDIR/control/servercert.pem and uses 512- and 1024-bit DH param files, as well. I can see that Ron's Spamdyke configuration is pointing at the same certificate, but doesn't support a separate DH param PEM as far as I can see. This last bit (the DH params) is the only major difference I can see between Qmail-TLS and Spamdyke. Going to test a few things ... ;) On 6/10/11 12:11 PM, ron wrote: > When I disable spamdyke, qmail accepts the emails just fine, its when > spamdyke is enabled that > the emails can not be received. Cert or no cert I wouldnt think makes a > difference, right? -- Dossy Shiobara | "He realized the fastest way to change [email protected] | is to laugh at your own folly -- then you http://panoptic.com/ | can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) * WordPress * jQuery * MySQL * Security * Business Continuity * _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
