I have downloaded and installed the current version of qmailtoaster if that helps with what I have installed.
On 6/10/2011 1:13 PM, Dossy Shiobara wrote: > It depends, is Qmail using a different cert than Spamdyke is? > > When you say you're doing TLS directly in Qmail, I'm assuming that > you're using a Qmail that has the Qmail-TLS patch applied? > http://inoa.net/qmail-tls/ > > Qmail-TLS appears to use $QMAILDIR/control/servercert.pem and uses 512- > and 1024-bit DH param files, as well. I can see that Ron's Spamdyke > configuration is pointing at the same certificate, but doesn't support a > separate DH param PEM as far as I can see. > > This last bit (the DH params) is the only major difference I can see > between Qmail-TLS and Spamdyke. Going to test a few things ... ;) > > > On 6/10/11 12:11 PM, ron wrote: >> When I disable spamdyke, qmail accepts the emails just fine, its when >> spamdyke is enabled that >> the emails can not be received. Cert or no cert I wouldnt think makes a >> difference, right? _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
