There are a number of other reasons to use Spanning Sync instead of CalDAV (see the original post at http://spanningsync.com/caldav-comparison), including bugs in Google's solution like the authentication problem everyone is currently running into:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-calendar-help-bugs/browse_thread/thread/5da2c474f335eba6/ Note also that Google has been completely silent about this problem even though it's been reported in various threads by dozens of people. (See difference #3 in our post: "Customer Support"). Regards, Charlie On Dec 4, 2:36 pm, "Hun Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I never make any changes on the iPhone though, is it advantage to utilize > the Google CalDAV vs. SS? I've heard some complaints on the internet about > authentication (iCal asking for passwords) though, is this true? > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:34 PM, cwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks, Ben! We're hearing the same thing from quite a few other > > people. > > > -c > > > On Dec 4, 2:28 pm, Ben W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think your point about the calendars becoming read-only on the > > > iPhone/iPod Touch using Google's solution is a really good one. It's > > > completely a show stopper for me, which makes me glad I'm a Spanning > > > Sync customer! > > -- > Hun Kim | GH Kim Photography |www.ghkim.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Spanning Sync" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spanningsync?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
