Furthermore, I noticed that when I didn't have an online connection, none of my Google Calendars displayed events in iCal: not terribly practical then! Even if error was mine, the fact that Spanning Sync has proved reliable for both my native iCal and Address contacts (online and offline) compelled me to go for purchasing a Spanning Sync license. (Hope to see some Spanning Sync integration of Google Tasks with iCal!) Best, Allan
On Dec 2 2008, 11:14 pm, cwood <[email protected]> wrote: > A number of people have asked how Google's CalDAV support compares to > Spanning Sync. As it turns out, there are quite a few important > differences, and I think Spanning Sync compares favorably. I've listed > the most important ones here: > > http://blog.spanningsync.com/2008/12/how-does-google-caldav-compare-t... > > Comments, questions, and suggestions appreciated. > > Thanks, > Charlie > Spanning Sync --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Spanning Sync" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spanningsync?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
