Thanks! It's always nice to learn from an answer such as yours (rather than just "it has nothing to do with it" type of answers I've got from other places... :)
On Oct 7, 11:35 am, Larry Hendricks <[email protected]> wrote: > VSIZE is not a very useful metric except in how it changes over time > (which can help identify memory leaks). The reason Spanning Sync has a > larger VSIZE than Photoshop is because it links to more system > libraries, but these are *shared* libraries so there's no impact. An > RSIZE of 17MB sounds very reasonable. > -- > Larry Hendricks > [email protected]http://spanningsync.com > > On Oct 7, 6:41 am, Sergio Majluf <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > Lately I'm feeling my iMac running 10.5.7 is getting slowish, so I > > frequently open Activity Monitor to check wether there's an app > > crasing, or so (I have the same machine at home, same setup, and it > > runs waaay faster) > > > Just today, I realized Spanning Sync 3 is usin more than 2.7Gb of > > virtual memory. As a comparison, Photoshop CS3 only goes up to 955Mb. > > > Also, the ratio of RSIZE vs/ VSIZE of spanning sync is one of the > > largest, having a small real footprint (17Mb), and the largest > > virtual. > > > Is this an issue? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Spanning Sync" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spanningsync?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
