Well then you could start from here, it'll go internetwide and will be
indexed by main search engines :)


On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Kaya Saman <kayasa...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Hi Paolo,
>
> I did it from Debian :-)
> - though any other OS should be identical mostly.
>
> Sure I could publish the information.... I guess I could stick it up on my
> wiki site but would prefer a more stable place for now as my hardware is a
> bit strained currently.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Kaya
>
>
>
> On 11/05/2012 03:56 PM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
>
> But, after all, did you do it from debian or openbsd tftp server?
> In the first case you could publish the full config for reference, it's
> still unpublished on the internet.
>
>
>  On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Kaya Saman <kayasa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  On 11/05/2012 02:41 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>
>>> On 2012/11/05 14:26, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>>
>>>> sunburst root=192.168.1.116:/iso/5.2/sparc64 swap=192.168.1.116:/mnt
>>>>
>>>> which is now fine and can boot the kernel however, in order to try to
>>>> install the OS I exported the CD via NFS.
>>>>
>>> You're booting bsd, you need to boot bsd.rd, then you can just do a
>>> standard installation via the usual installer. Either tell the machine
>>> to boot bsd.rd (something like boot net:bsd.rd iirc, but I can never
>>> remember exactly what, unfortunately the sparc64 boot loader doesn't
>>> let you choose the kernel as most other arch do so you have to
>>> catch it in ofw and do it there), or just copy bsd.rd to bsd in
>>> the nfs tree.
>>>
>>> You should be able to mount and use the nfs-exported tgz if you want
>>> (the sparc64 ramdisk does have nfs client), though I normally just do a
>>> standard http install.
>>>
>>>
>>  Thanks so much Stuart, I've managed to successfully install OpenBSD 5.2
>> now which is using the GENERIC.mp kernel so I guess all is well :-)
>>
>> Now I just need to figure out while using it as router/firewall/nat if I
>> will get better transfer speeds then my Netra T105 so that I can have a
>> proper firewall again for my DSL WAN link.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> Kaya

Reply via email to