Sorry if this is covered somewhere else, I was unable to find the
answer to this question.

I am using TPP with SEQUEST to search for peptides in mass spectra.

I had an original fastafile (specified in the parameters file by
"database_name=") that I have been using for all my database_search
runs. I just generated a new fasta file that included the possibility
of amino acids being cut off the N-terminus of the protein fragments.

E.G.
If the original fasta file contained MVMNDANQAQITATFKTK

The new fasta file contains
MVMNDANQAQITATFKTK
VMNDANQAQITATFKTK
MNDANQAQITATFKTK
NDANQAQITATFKTK
DANQAQITATFKTK
ANQAQITATFKTK
NQAQITATFKTK
QAQITATFKTK
AQITATFKTK

These sequences were included because I was concerned that the
database_search would not find proteins where the N-terminus was
modified. (My work mainly concerns the N-termini of proteins).

I ran some preliminary tests to see how this would affect the run
speed and results.

Using the original fasta file, a run took 3.5 hours. Using the new
longer fasta file (which has all the sequences of the original file
and more), the same run took 2 hours.

There were about 6000 peptides found when run with the original fasta
file and only about 2500 peptides found when run with the new longer
fasta file.

Using the new fasta file, I found some peptide matches with
probability of 1 that had slightly lower probability (around 0.9) when
using the original fasta file.

MY QUESTIONS:

Does using a longer fasta file somehow cause a lose of precision when
searching for peptide matches in mass spec data?

How does the fasta file length (and specifically adding the same
sequences with a shortened N-terminus) affect the database_searches
and more importantly the peptide matches output?

Thank,
Kris
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to