Hi Matt,

Msconvert looks to be producing .mzXML 2.0 by default. This is causing
an issue for the downstream software (Progenesis LC-MS). Does
msconvert support any later versions of .mzXML?

Thanks,
Ben

On Sep 30, 4:46 pm, Ben Collins <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Moshe,
>
> I'm currently using Progenesis LC-MS, a commercial label free analysis
> software. The feature finding takes a long time. I have also been able to
> analyse some of this data with msInspect.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Moshe Olshansky <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Ben,
>
> > Just out of curiosity, what tools can handle your "small" 14 GB file?
>
> > Regards,
>
> > Moshe.
>
> > > Hi Matt,
>
> > > Thanks, this seems to have done the trick. I now have a 14 GB mzXML file
> > > instead of 50 GB.
>
> > > I am interested to know whether the peak picking is being done with
> > > MassHunter or Proteowizard in this case?
>
> > > Many thanks,
> > > Ben.
>
> > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Matt Chambers <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> Hi Ben,
>
> > >> 50gb for one file? That's impressive. That could be much improved with
> > >> compression (which the Agilent MH format also does), but since you need
> > >> to peak pick the MSn to identify them in most search engines, try this
> > >> command:
> > >> msconvert source.d --mzXML --filter "peakPicking true [2,2]"
> > >> There is a bug in msconvert's Reader_Agilent (actually I think it's in
> > >> MHDAC; I'm looking into it now with Agilent) that sometimes will always
> > >> centroid profile data no matter whether it was requested or not. So even
> > >> though the above command doesn't specify to peak pick the MS1s, it may
> > >> do so anyway. If that's the case, let me know and I can get you a fixed
> > >> build with a workaround in place.
>
> > >> -Matt
>
> > >> Ben Collins wrote:
> > >> > Hi all,
>
> > >> > I have data from an Agilent QTOF (.d) collected in profile mode (both
> > >> > MS1 and MS2) and I would like to convert to mzXML which I can do with
> > >> > Trapper or msconvert. The question I have is, is it possible to
> > >> > perform centroiding only on the MS2 data while leaving the MS1 data in
> > >> > profile mode?
>
> > >> > Unfortunately it's not currently possible to collect MS1 in profile
> > >> > and MS2 in centroid on this instrument (I have requrested it from the
> > >> > vendor). The issue is that if both files are in profile mode the files
> > >> > is pretty unmanageable (up to 50 GB) but I need to keep the MS1 data
> > >> > in profile to do AMT/label free analysis.
>
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Ben
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to