Hi everyone, I agree it would be great to make the enumeration of search engines more complete. Let's add all these. And I would suggest adding Crux and Tide, too.
Regards, Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:spctools- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew Chambers > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 11:49 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [spctools-discuss] Re: How to add search engine names to > the pepXML search_summary entity, search_engine attribute enumeration? > > At least add: > ProteinPilot > ProteinLynx > Spectrum Mill > greylag > Phenyx > Proteios > > Instead of looking at just which engines are compatible with TPP or can > directly output pepXML, I prefer that it supports any engine whose > output is or can be converted to pepXML (and not necessarily with just > the Analysis2XML converters). A little bird told me about a > ProteinPilot > group2pepXML converter that can't be redistributed by its creators and > ABI refuses to do so even though they've had the code for about a year. > I know that Spectrum Mill and Phenyx have pepXML output as well. > > Our group doesn't much care about validation errors due to an > incomplete > schema enumeration, but having it in there would be nice. > > -Matt > > > On 6/24/2010 1:19 PM, Natalie Tasman wrote: > > Hi Nathan, > > > > The search engines in pepXML are those which have been specifically > > tested with the TPP. Regarding Matt's suggestion: as far as I > > understand, the PSI groups are moving towards a new analysis > standard: > > http://psidev.info/index.php?q=node/319. > > > > I haven't worked with that standard or followed those discussions > > closely, but it might make sense to put effort into this new > direction > > rather than trying to extend pepXML towards a universal format. > > > > > > On the other hand, if there are search engines which are compatible > > with the TPP (at least, output pepXML) and are not yet in the schema, > > we should definitely include those. > > > > -Natalie > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Matthew Chambers > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Everything in this list would be good. Some of it isn't shotgun- > capable, but > >> that doesn't seem very damaging: > >> http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ontology- > lookup/browse.do?ontName=MS&termId=MS:1001456 > >> > >> -Matt > >> > >> > >> On 6/24/2010 11:53 AM, Jesse J wrote: > >> > >>> Out of curiosity, what search engines did you have in mind? > >>> > >>> On Jun 24, 9:41 am, Nathan Edwards<[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> The wiki says to send this request to the spctools-dev mailing > list, > >>>> but I can't find out where this list is, or how to send to it. > >>>> > >>>> I'd like to request the addition of a (few) search engine names to > the > >>>> pepXML search_summary entity, search_engine attribute enumeration. > >>>> > >>>> How do I go about this? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> - n > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "spctools-discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to spctools- > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
