Thanks for reply, Alexey. I am using the latest version, and I've posted my question on git.https://github.com/chhh/MSFragger-GUI/issues/63
David On Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at 12:56:51 PM UTC-7, Alexey Nesvizhskii wrote: > > David, > > We have done many comparisons. You should be getting very similar results > when performing closed searches. > You can post questions on MSFragger here: > https://github.com/chhh/MSFragger-GUI/issues > > Also, are you using the latest version? > You can get the latest version of MSFragger here: > http://msfragger.arsci.com/upgrader/ > > Best, > Alexey Nesvizhskii > > On Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at 12:40:51 PM UTC-4, David Zhao wrote: >> >> Hi there, >> >> We've started to evaluate MsFragger tool, has anybody done a comparison >> between Comet and MsFragger? Is it complementary to Comet? We've run a >> couple of MsFragger searches, using parameters converted from comet >> parameters, it seems MsFragger is focusing more on finding more PTMs, which >> results in many long peptide hits, and overriding charge option doesn't >> seem to be working... >> >> Any inputs or comments is greatly appreciated! >> Thanks, >> >> David >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
