I would not recommend using the 0.05% cutoff.  I was able to open your file
and apply same filters you applied.  I am using Firefox browser.  Which
version of the TPP are you using?

Thanks,
-David

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Adam Rabalski <rabal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> Yes this is the file. Briefly, I would open it and after a few minutes
> once loaded in Chrome I filter using an iProphet cutoff of 0.7360 and a
> text filter for 478.99|480.99 modification (subscript checked on). Trying
> to display all entries, or attempting to export to a spreadsheet results in
> the error warning. I'm running another analysis currently with a 0.05
> cutoff. What browser are you using?
>
> Best,
>
> Adam
>
> On Friday, August 31, 2018 at 5:25:27 PM UTC-5, David Shteynberg wrote:
>>
>> Hello Adam,
>>
>> I have not been able to replicate the issue you observed on the file you
>> gave me.  Are you sure that the file you posted is the one showing up with
>> the error?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -David
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:03 PM, Adam Rabalski <raba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Considering the size of the file, which editors/viewers do you use at
>>> ISB to open XML file in order to pinpoint a problem? I have re-run the
>>> analysis as I had 87 fractions and 10 of them were labelled with timestamps
>>> (occurs when XCalibur attempts to write a filename that already exists in a
>>> directory so it creates a new file with the date/time added on to it) so I
>>> changed these file names as I thought that this might be the problem
>>> because I could not view peptides beyond this fraction number but am still
>>> running into the same issue and have different "error with html display"
>>> pointing to different lines depending on how I filter the xml file. Would
>>> reducing the output size help here? The only thing that I can think of
>>> doing is increasing the PeptideProphet Probability filter to 0.05 from 0.00
>>> (which I typically use) in order to reduce the number of entries written .
>>>
>>> On Thursday, August 30, 2018 at 1:03:24 PM UTC-5, David Shteynberg wrote:
>>>
>>>> The errors above suggest that the pepXML files are not parser compliant
>>>> and cannot be read.  Sometimes this could be caused by bad characters in
>>>> the protein descriptions from the fasta database, you have to look at the
>>>> specific lines pointed to by the error messages to identify the exact
>>>> issue.  If you can post your failing files and I can take a look.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to spctools-discu...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to spctools...@googlegroups.com.
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "spctools-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to spctools-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to spctools-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to