Thank you Eric for the clarification. This is very helpful! Josh
On Friday, July 24, 2020 at 1:57:18 AM UTC-4, Eric Deutsch wrote: > > Hi Josh, yes. The ‘sp’ stands for Swiss-Prot. These are the Swiss-Prot > identifiers for the common contaminants in samples. Of course, if your > sample was a human sample, some of the human proteins may be legitimately > in your sample not because of contamination, but it’s hard to know. > > > > Note that strictly “CRAPome” (https://www.crapome.org/) is different than > cRAP.fasta. > > > > Regards, > > Eric > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] <javascript:> < > [email protected] <javascript:>> *On Behalf Of *Josh Yu > *Sent:* Thursday, July 23, 2020 7:07 PM > *To:* spctools-discuss <[email protected] <javascript:>> > *Subject:* [spctools-discuss] Are these crapome? > > > > Hi All, > > > > I used crap.fasta trying to identify possible contaminants in my > proteomics analysis, and here's the result. Are these "sp" proteins > contaminants? > > Thanks, > > Josh > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "spctools-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/324286e4-6ef8-4535-936c-510946de3e09o%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/324286e4-6ef8-4535-936c-510946de3e09o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/9be052c4-6edb-4774-a93f-164ce917af46o%40googlegroups.com.
