Hi David

Will do so, thank you! That makes a lot of sense. I have also added the 
mzXML files but this might be the cause of the discrepancy I see!

Thanks
Shagun

On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 4:42:46 PM UTC-4 David Shteynberg wrote:

> Hello Shagun,
>
> I noticed in your condition file you are using TMT10 with the following 
> masses:
>  <reagent mz="126.127726" />
>     <reagent mz="127.124761" />
>     <reagent mz="127.131081" />
>     <reagent mz="128.128116" />
>     <reagent mz="128.134436" />
>     <reagent mz="129.131471" />
>     <reagent mz="129.137790" />
>     <reagent mz="130.134825" />
>     <reagent mz="130.141145" />
>     <reagent mz="131.138180" />
>
>
> The difference between neighboring channels is <0.01 at the lowest and yet 
> you are using tolerance of 0.2:
>
> <massTolerance value="0.2" />
>
>
> I think the appropriate mass tolerance for this type of labeling should be 
> ~0.001.
>
> Does that make sense?  Please try running Libra with the mass tolerance 
> appropriate for this type of label. 
>
> Cheers,
> -David
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 10:34 AM Shagun Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi David
>>
>> Could you suggest a good email to reach you with? I can share the 
>> pep.xml's and Libra condition file that way?
>>
>> -Shagun
>>
>> On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 11:00:38 AM UTC-4 David Shteynberg wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Shagun,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your email and interest in the TPP.  I have recently been 
>>> comparing TMTPro analysis by ProteomeDiscoverer and Byonic to that produced 
>>> by TPP's Libra.  As far as I can tell, when I run and compare the 
>>> quantities (intensities) they are mostly the same between Libra (without 
>>> isotopic impurity correction and 0 pseudocounts) and the 
>>> ProteomeDiscoverer/Byonic.  Execution of Libra is defined in the 
>>> conditions.xml file that has to be defined for each Libra run.  I would be 
>>> happy to take a look at your data and analysis to see if it can be placed 
>>> on the right path for the Libra analysis to work.  Please post your results 
>>> somewhere I can download and test.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -David
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 6:36 AM Shagun Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> Our lab has been trying to use Libra to quantify MS2 (Ion-trap) 
>>>> identification and MS3-based quantification of TMT datasets and we were 
>>>> trying to benchmark with an artificial yeast and mammalian spiked dataset 
>>>> with known fold-change (FC) values. However we observe drastically 
>>>> different values than expected, something we don't observe with other 
>>>> search engines for the same dataset. 
>>>>
>>>> Has this issue been encountered before/ is there something obviously 
>>>> wrong when running with TPP that might cause this? Happy to provide 
>>>> further 
>>>> details on the dataset and parameters used to run with (most of them 
>>>> default apart from additions like static modification for TMT and 
>>>> specification of MS3 for quantification among others).
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Shagun
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/ce2c75fb-2da1-4e05-8d08-bbe5a30b0495n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/ce2c75fb-2da1-4e05-8d08-bbe5a30b0495n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "spctools-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/7a0b1188-7c5f-4528-9e90-282b860e7627n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/7a0b1188-7c5f-4528-9e90-282b860e7627n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/9f9b5ee4-bfd0-4279-8ea6-dffb3932b7een%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to