On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 01:10:44PM -0400, Wayne Beaton wrote:
> Exhibit A - Form of Secondary Licenses Notice
>
> "This Source Code may also be made available under the following
> Secondary Licenses when the conditions for such availability set forth
> in the Eclipse Public License, v. 2.0 are satisfied: {name license(s),
> version(s), and exceptions or additional permissions here}."This seems like the new version. The OSI still hasn't published their approved text [1], although they were originally considering the “This Source Code is also Distributed under” wording [2] and that's what they approved [3]. The text change is under OCI discussion in [4], but that just started yesterday. We probably want to wait and see how the change shakes out in the OSI before stamping an ID for the final text. Cheers, Trevor [1]: https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical [2]: https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2017-June/003048.html Subject: [License-review] For Approval: Eclipse Public LIcense version 2.0 Date: Thu Jun 15 19:50:51 UTC 2017 [3]: https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2017-August/003074.html Subject: [License-review] For Approval: Eclipse Public LIcense version 2.0 Date: Thu Aug 10 17:11:18 UTC 2017 [4]: https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2017-September/003082.html Subject: [License-review] New Exhibit A for EPLv2 Date: Thu Sep 14 21:11:06 UTC 2017 -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Spdx-legal mailing list [email protected] https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
