Hi all, I was browsing through the FAQ and found out that since we (re)renamed the GPL family in license list 3.0, we haven’t updated the texts in the FAQ yet.
<https://spdx.org/frequently-asked-questions-faq-0> Most specifically, this question should be amended: > Why do I only see GPL-2.0 only listed on the SPDX License List? How do I > represent a GPL-2.0 or later license option? > > Licenses that allow an "or later" license option are represented via a > license expression using the + operator. For example, a file that is > subject to GPL-2.0 or later, would be represted by: GPL-2.0+ Best probably to split it into two examples: • a GPL one (GPL-2.0-only vs GPL-2.0-or-later); and • a generic one (e.g. MPL-1.0+) cheers, Matija Šuklje -- gsm: +386 41 849 552 www: http://matija.suklje.name xmpp: matija.suk...@gabbler.org sip: matija_suk...@ippi.fr _______________________________________________ Spdx-legal mailing list Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
