On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:53:41AM +0100, Matija Šuklje wrote:
> I was browsing through the FAQ and found out that since we
> (re)renamed the GPL family in license list 3.0, we haven’t updated
> the texts in the FAQ yet.

+1 on updating the FAQ.  I think we also want to explicitly list the
spec and license-list versions we're talking about as well, to help
folks during transitions (some folks may still be using license-list
2.x tools and would appreciate access to FAQ discussion about those
identifiers).  And I think the spec could use more specifics about the
default value for LicenseListVersion [1].  Currently it's not clear to
me which version of the license-list is implied when the optional
LicenseListVersion is not set.


This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Spdx-legal mailing list

Reply via email to