Thanks ARW and Dennis, Issue for this opened (and you can track progress) here: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/636
The legal team will assess and decide on these licenses there. We have just finalized the new licenses for the 3.1 release of the list, so this will likely need to wait until the release after that. Thank you, Brad Edmondson -- Brad Edmondson, *Esq.* 512-673-8782 | brad.edmond...@gmail.com On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Dennis Clark <dmcl...@nexb.com> wrote: > Hi Legal Team, > > For the record, the proposed license is currently recognized by ScanCode > as tu-berlin. > > https://github.com/nexB/scancode-toolkit/blob/ > 4e63a6775a895fdec5a3a53f96013399fa34b1b7/src/licensedcode/ > data/licenses/tu-berlin.yml > > Regards, > Dennis Clark > > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:09 PM, A. Wilcox <awil...@adelielinux.org> wrote: > >> Proposed Full Name: >> >> Technische Universitaet Berlin License >> >> Permissive Technische Universitaet Berlin License [???] >> >> >> Proposed Short Identifier: >> >> TU-Berlin-1.0 >> >> TU-Berlin-2.0 >> >> >> URL references: >> >> 1.0: >> >> http://alpha.tmit.bme.hu/pub/audio/gsm-1.0/copyrigh >> https://github.com/swh/ladspa/blob/master/gsm/COPYRIGHT >> >> >> 2.0: >> >> https://github.com/CorsixTH/deps/blob/master/licences/libgsm.txt >> https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu-leb/oneiric/+source/lib >> gsm/+copyright >> >> >> OSI-approved? >> >> No. >> >> >> Packages using this license: >> >> gsm / libgsm >> >> via inclusion of gsm code: ladspa, rplay, speex, some builds of vorbis >> >> >> Date: >> >> 1.0: 15-Sep-1992 >> 2.0: 05-Apr-2009 >> >> >> Explanation (non-normative): >> >> I did not find any reference to these licenses in the tracking page. I >> have only seen this used in gsm; I do not know if the university has >> released other open source projects. (No further packages were found >> searching for key, unique phrases in DuckDuckGo nor Google nor GitHub.) >> >> Fedora seems to consider this "MIT", but other than some similarities in >> 2.0 to MIT/PetSC and MIT/HP, this license has nothing more than a >> spiritual relation to MIT in my opinion. >> >> If this should instead be considered a MIT variant, I would be willing >> to resubmit as that. >> >> Thanks for your consideration. >> >> >> Best, >> --arw >> >> -- >> A. Wilcox (awilfox) >> Project Lead, Adélie Linux >> http://adelielinux.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spdx-legal mailing list >> Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org >> https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Spdx-legal mailing list > Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org > https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal > >
_______________________________________________ Spdx-legal mailing list Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
