I would suggest the following: Full name: copyleft-next 0.3.1 Identifier: copyleft-next-0.3.1
- Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "J Lovejoy" <opensou...@jilayne.com> To: "SPDX-legal" <spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 12:04:17 AM Subject: Re: New License/Exception Request: copyleft-next Richard, As the author of the license, do you have any input/preference as to the full name and identifier? (we usually try to ask the author, if the license is not submitted by the author) Thanks, Jilayne SPDX Legal Team co-lead opensou...@jilayne.com On Sep 20, 2018, at 3:39 PM, Richard Fontana <rfont...@redhat.com> wrote: On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 10:08:13AM -0500, Kuno Woudt wrote: > > 5. Indicate whether the license is OSI-approved (see: > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical) or whether it has been > submitted for approval to the OSI and is currently under review. > > The license is not formally OSI approved, nor has it been submitted for > review (AFAIK). Correct on both counts. - Richard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#2380): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/message/2380 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/25836301/21656 Group Owner: spdx-legal+ow...@lists.spdx.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
