Hi Nuno,

Thanks for the feedback.

The definitions should be in sync with the tag/value, but those definitions
are still in progress for 2.0.  BTW - The tag/value definitions will be the
"master" for the RDF annotation text.

I don't know of any sample document with tag/value.  We did send around a
simple RDF document to try out the external references to other SPDX
documents.  Here's a link to the thread:
http://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx-tech/2014-July/002437.html  Note that
the verificationCode in the relationship has problems and will need to be
changed.

Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:spdx-tech-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Nuno Brito
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 3:38 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: RDF documentation update
> 
> Hi Gary,
> 
> The screenshot looks good. Happy to see automated documentation
> available.
> 
> Are the definitions on the screenshot also applicable to tag/value?
> 
> Would it be possible to provide a snippet or sample document with the
> new syntax to see it in practice?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> With kind regards,
> Nuno Brito
> _______________________________________________
> Spdx-tech mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech

_______________________________________________
Spdx-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech

Reply via email to