Ok, thanks.
If possible, I volunteer to help with the testing of the tag/value on
different open source projects once 2.0 is considered as stable enough,
mostly to test its usability.
With kind regards,
Nuno Brito
On 29-07-2014 05:25, Gary O'Neall wrote:
Hi Nuno,
Thanks for the feedback.
The definitions should be in sync with the tag/value, but those definitions
are still in progress for 2.0. BTW - The tag/value definitions will be the
"master" for the RDF annotation text.
I don't know of any sample document with tag/value. We did send around a
simple RDF document to try out the external references to other SPDX
documents. Here's a link to the thread:
http://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx-tech/2014-July/002437.html Note that
the verificationCode in the relationship has problems and will need to be
changed.
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:spdx-tech-
[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nuno Brito
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 3:38 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: RDF documentation update
Hi Gary,
The screenshot looks good. Happy to see automated documentation
available.
Are the definitions on the screenshot also applicable to tag/value?
Would it be possible to provide a snippet or sample document with the
new syntax to see it in practice?
Thanks.
With kind regards,
Nuno Brito
_______________________________________________
Spdx-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
--
http://triplecheck.de
phone: +49 615 146 03187
_______________________________________________
Spdx-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
