there are 106 instances of “SPDX file” and 74 instances of “SPDX document” - do we want to make consistent to one or the other?
J. > On May 4, 2015, at 3:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Sounds good. > > Thanks! > > Kate > > > > On Monday, May 4, 2015 9:54 AM, "Manbeck, Jack" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Kate, > > I checked it and clicked all the links. Some hyper links were obvious > examples (i.e. the acme ones) so they don’t go anywhere. I have some minor > comments on the links but they are suggestions and I will file a bug report. > This looks good to post. I will co-ordinate with Gary. > > Jack > > > From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] > Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2015 11:03 PM > To: Mark Gisi; Jilayne Lovejoy; Manbeck, Jack > Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: SPDX 2.0 - posted in > http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Technical_Team/SPDX_Specification_Versions > <http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Technical_Team/SPDX_Specification_Versions> > > Hi Jack, > I've posted the 2.0 version of the specification on the WIKI now. > It includes the changes from Jilay (via .doc) and Mark Gisi (wiki page). > > I think I've managed to get all the alginement sorted, and hyperlinks > working, etc. But would welcome someone else downloading them > and confirming there are no problems. > > Thanks, Kate
_______________________________________________ Spdx-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
