Hi Jilayne,
Caught some, but agree that they should all be made consistent. Suggest
we just handle this as a bug at this point.
Kate
On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 11:56 AM, J Lovejoy <[email protected]> wrote:
there are 106 instances of “SPDX file” and 74 instances of “SPDX document” -
do we want to make consistent to one or the other?
J.
On May 4, 2015, at 3:00 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Sounds good.
Thanks!
Kate
On Monday, May 4, 2015 9:54 AM, "Manbeck, Jack" <[email protected]> wrote:
Kate, I checked it and clicked all the links. Some hyper links were obvious
examples (i.e. the acme ones) so they don’t go anywhere. I have some minor
comments on the links but they are suggestions and I will file a bug report.
This looks good to post. I will co-ordinate with Gary. Jack From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2015 11:03 PM
To: Mark Gisi; Jilayne Lovejoy; Manbeck, Jack
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: SPDX 2.0 - posted in
http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Technical_Team/SPDX_Specification_Versions Hi Jack,
I've posted the 2.0 version of the specification on the WIKI now.It includes
the changes from Jilay (via .doc) and Mark Gisi (wiki page). I think I've
managed to get all the alginement sorted, and hyperlinksworking, etc. But
would welcome someone else downloading themand confirming there are no
problems. Thanks, Kate
_______________________________________________
Spdx-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
