On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Gary O'Neall <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Yev,
> Thanks for the pointer to the pointer vocabulary.
> Below are some of my thoughts - feel free to propose alternatives or provide 
> more specific examples on how we may use the pointer class for Snippets.
> - I do think  using the pointer classes would work for our purposes and would 
> have the advantage of using an already defined vocabulary.  It is a bit more 
> complex, but manageable.
> - I noticed that the pointers RDF vocabulary defines byte offsets based on 1 
> for the first byte in the document (not zero).  If we want to re-use these 
> terms, we would need to define the byte ranges relative to 1 for both RDF and 
> Tag/Value for compatibility.
> - Pointers include a required property to reference the document the byte 
> range applies to.  We could use the URI for the SPDX file as the value for 
> this property.  This would somewhat redundant with the SPDX File property.  
> Not sure if we should retain both of these properties or not.  I'm currently 
> leaning toward retaining both properties.
> - There are a few choices on how to represent the byte range.  After looking 
> through the doc, the ByteOffsetCompondPointer uses an offset relative to the 
> startPointer (the pointer to the beginning of the range).  Based the 
> tag/value definition where the start byte and end bytes are relative to the 
> beginning of the file,  a StartEndPointer may be a better fit.  The 
> startPointer and endPointer would be a ByteOffsetPointer class to represent a 
> byte offset.
> - If we want to include optional line number offset, we could use the 
> LineCharPointer class.
> Below is an example based on my understanding of the pointer vocabulary:
[....]

I think using bytes is impractical.
For instance, files from a simple git or svn checkout may be different
byte for byte on different machines and different settings
(end-of-line replacement, keyword substitution, etc) .

We are talking about line-oriented text source code.
Why not use the simpler, natural and human-understandable start and end line?
The compounded complexity of RDF and bytes is unlikely warranted here.

-- 
Cordially
Philippe Ombredanne
_______________________________________________
Spdx-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech

Reply via email to