Ok thanks, i thought the identifier was tying all the license name. fsf was an example but thanks for pointing me to this :) On 11/16/2015 04:56 PM, Sam Ellis wrote: >> since fsf-unlimited is not a standard >> license. > > In case you didn’t see, there are two standard identifiers for some FSF > unlimited licenses already: > > https://spdx.org/licenses/FSFUL.html > https://spdx.org/licenses/FSFULLR.html > > > > ________________________________ > > -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the > information in any medium. Thank you. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Spdx-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
