W. Trevor King wrote: > They also list the Expat license as free and GPL-compatible [5], and > it matches the SPDX MIT [6]. So you can say the FSF considers the > SPDX MIT free and GPL-compatible.
Ah right - so not as interesting an example as others I was thinking of. I've been thinking about this because there's been some interest among the FSF and OSI in seeing where exactly the lists of FSF-recognized-as-free and OSI-approved licenses disagree. It's an accident of history that the Expat license text, rather than the X11 license text, is what came to be known as the MIT license, I suppose. Richard _______________________________________________ Spdx-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-tech
