On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:59:05AM -0700, James Neushul wrote: > 1. What's up with "IsFsfLibre" .. it's in lots of licences but not > in SPDX.rdf
The FSF wanted that information in our published license list [1], where we'd have an existing "OSI Approved?" column. There was lots of discussion about how to maintain the data [2, among other places]. The current approach has the data in [3]. That data is pulled by the publisher [4] which generates [1] and [5]. There are open issues about getting the field documented in downstream locations [6,7]. Cheers, Trevor [1]: https://spdx.org/licenses/ [2]: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/pull/453 [3]: https://github.com/wking/fsf-api [4]: https://github.com/spdx/LicenseListPublisher [5]: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data [6]: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/issues/14 [7]: https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec/issues/46 -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3602): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/3602 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/22083221/21656 Group Owner: spdx-tech+ow...@lists.spdx.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
