I updated the  proposed modified template
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1suJimqPOqD1UcZyTQJ5G2XeEbkpoVnu7VOGoy_q
s_yY/edit?usp=sharing>  based on the outcome of the SPDX tech call today.

 

One item I forgot to mention was the Status attribute.  In the OWL document,
this is used to track whether the class or property is stable, deprecated,
or currently being discussed/reviewed (i.e. unstable).  You'll find this in
the attribute table for both the class and the field.

 

Gary

 

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Gary
O'Neall
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 1:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [spdx-tech] Markdown / OWL analysis and proposed changes to
Markdown format

 

Greetings SPDX tech team - 

 

I completed a first pass analysis of the current 3.0 proposed Markdown
template to see which fields can be feasibly translated to the OWL schema
format.

 

TL;DR - It can be done, but requires some format changes to the proposed
markdown.

 

A bit more detail - I have a proposed modified template
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1suJimqPOqD1UcZyTQJ5G2XeEbkpoVnu7VOGoy_q
s_yY/edit?usp=sharing> .  Changes are summarized in square brackets.  The
most substantial change is to document in some way the subclass
relationships.  I think this may reduce duplication in the markdown document
independent of if we use it for the OWL document maintenance.

 

Gory details: See the SPDX Markdown OWL Sync
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EGoAmKxPfmmlF3XV6fXwNmsCiFKLH83Bhh8_xrm
Ghko/edit?usp=sharing>  document.  The table contains all the fields in the
OWL document which needs information from the Markdown document.  Green
color - easy; Yellow - can be done, but difficult; Red - not feasible
currently.  In the cells I make specific recommendations.

 

I can go over the proposal in tomorrow Tech call.

 

Gary

 

-------------------------------------------------

Gary O'Neall

Principal Consultant

Source Auditor Inc.

Mobile: 408.805.0586

Email:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information transmitted, including attachments, is
intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and destroy any copies of this information.

 





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#3986): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/3986
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/80665049/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to