The link has somehow made it into the wrong hands and a lot of weird stuff is popping up, I have removed permissions, and will add permissions whenever requested.
On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 6:44 PM William Bartholomew <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for pulling this together, this is very useful. I just dropped in > some initial thoughts. > > William > > Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of > Brandon Lum via lists.spdx.org <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Saturday, April 16, 2022 11:08 AM > *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [spdx-tech] Adding Build SBOM relationships for > S3C resiliency > > Pre-sharing the document I've been stitching together (don't treat it as > final/complete- more as a jumping off point for discussion, would like more > input from folks that are more familiar with reproducible builds). > > Looking forward to more discussions on Monday at the build profile sync! > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D4L4u-YXABMHPYEukE4HiBzslsKoDKueNNIbj6lDA5o/edit?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-gmG-nkb9ykFNsndBSacE2w > <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1D4L4u-YXABMHPYEukE4HiBzslsKoDKueNNIbj6lDA5o%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing%26resourcekey%3D0-gmG-nkb9ykFNsndBSacE2w&data=05%7C01%7Cwillbar%40microsoft.com%7C996d054dc77f42a97cc808da1fd42f6b%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637857293849677516%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qZopTLQzk0AihfPYFJTiO7SeqJKECc45cG4V9jcROYc%3D&reserved=0> > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 11:51 AM Sebastian Crane <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Dear Kate, > > I too would like to attend this - it's a really interesting facet of > SPDX as it covers more use-cases. Could it be the following week, as > later than the 3.0 focus session would be late evening/night for me > here in Britain? > > Best wishes, > > Sebastian > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 08:21:06AM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote: > > Hi Brandon, > > > > Invitation was sent directly to those who filled in the participation > > survey. It's in addition to our regular meeting, with a specific > purpose > > to help close the 3.0 model punchlist with key stakeholders being present > > to make progress. > > > > I suggest we aim for a spot later that day, or the following week as > it > > may be a different audience interested in the topic. Send me 1:1 some > > options that work for you and I'll start a doodle off on a separate > thread, > > and we can collect those interested in working on the build profile > > definition, then set up an initial meeting. > > That work as a plan? > > > > Thanks, > > Kate > > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4466): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/4466 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/89846631/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
