Thanks Dennis.  It appears that scancode has already done the
administrative work to establish a unified (non-federated) license list.

*   Key          Shortname       SPDX ID           *
apache-2.0    Apache 2.0     Apache-2.0
apl-1.1       APL-1.1        LicenseRef-scancode-apl-1.1

Federated identity management is well-understood by users - nobody would
mistakenly think that [email protected] (or gmail:Dave99 using
namespace:local notation) is the same person as [email protected] (or
outlook:Dave99).  But switching to federated license IDs (spdx:Apache-2.0
and scancode:apl-1.1) doesn't sound like a user-friendly solution.  The
only thing that federation buys you is the ability to use colliding local
IDs.  But the cost is having to use qualified license IDs in order to avoid
confusion and collisions.  Is refusing to collaborate on
deconflicting local IDs really worth that cost?

Questions:
1) has scancode assigned any Keys that case-insensitively match an SPDX ID
but do not match license texts?  (I assume not.)
2) has the SPDX legal team agreed to not assign any SPDX IDs that
case-insensitively match a current or future Scancode Key without matching
license texts?  (I hope so, otherwise migrating to qualified license IDs is
unavoidable.)
3) for additional license authorities (e.g., "acme") is the same
first-come-first-served id deconfliction rule acceptable?
4) What problem are you trying to solve by not agreeing on a unified local
ID list?

A unified list can always include a registration authority column to
communicate different registration requirements. I don't understand the
need for anything else.

Dave


On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:47 AM Dennis Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

> Here is an example license list:
>
> https://scancode-licensedb.aboutcode.org/
>
> Regards,
> Dennis Clark
>
>>
>>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#4581): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/4581
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/91653387/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to