Dear David: On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 6:57 AM David Kemp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Philippe, > >> I am not sure I read you correctly but if are you suggesting that >> Dennis, other ScanCode contributors and I are "refusing to collaborate >> on deconflicting local IDs" for SPDX license ids, that's quite the >> opposite. > > > I did not think that, and I sincerely apologize for ineptly giving that > impression. My intention was to thank Dennis for the opportunity to learn > about ScanCode, and to express puzzlement that a namespacing approach was > being considered. > > I hope that processes and procedures for maintaining a coordinated license > list can be worked out, and I'll try to avoid further interfering with that > process.
You are not interfering at all... and I found your reply and insights super useful. I do not know your background, but it is clear that you have experience in this domain. So please do not stop! -- Cordially Philippe Ombredanne -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4584): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/4584 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/91653387/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
