Hello spdx-legal and spdx-tech team lists, As a reminder, following from the joint teams meeting in January, there is a pending Change Proposal [1] regarding whether and how to add the ability to express custom license "exceptions" (or "modifiers", or "additions") in SPDX license expressions.
This is one of the primary open items to be decided upon in connection with the draft SPDX 3.0 licensing profile [2]. So if the licensing profile will include support for some form of this for 3.0, we'll need to conclude on what and how it will be implemented. If you have thoughts, please review that Change Proposal thread and the linked proposed PRs, and weigh in on that issue thread with your input. Best, Steve [1] https://github.com/spdx/change-proposal/issues/4 [2] https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/tree/licensing-profile/model/Licensing -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#5054): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/5054 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/97912782/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
