I'd still say that "serialization doesn't matter", assuming that there is a 1:1 mapping between RDF license IRIs and SPDX License Identifiers.
License ID: "Apache-2.0" RDF IRI: "https://rdf.spdx.org/v3/LicenseID/Apache-2.0"; where the namespace prefix is a notional example but should be the same for all SPDX license IDs. Yes, they are different strings for different serializations, but if it's trivial to go from one to the other, "it doesn't matter". On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 5:20 PM Dick Brooks < [email protected]> wrote: > Many thanks to Alexios for educating me on the different content models > used by SPDX to express a declaredLicense, at the meeting last Friday. > > > > I mistakenly assumed that all serialization approaches used SPDX License > identifiers (https://spdx.org/licenses/). > > > > I was not aware that RDF uses URL’s to identify declaredLicense values. > > > > My apologies for asserting that “serialization format doesn’t matter” for > declaredLicense content, based on a bad assumption. > > > > Thanks for the education, Alexios. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dick Brooks > > > > *Active Member of the CISA Critical Manufacturing Sector, * > > *Sector Coordinating Council – A Public-Private Partnership* > > > > *Never trust software, always verify and report! > <https://reliableenergyanalytics.com/products>* ™ > > http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com > > Email: [email protected] > > Tel: +1 978-696-1788 > > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#5192): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/5192 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/99595792/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
