Alexios,

 

Regarding this assertion,  “having a value of NOASSERTION as packageVersion 
means that the SBOM including this does NOT meet NTIA’s minimum requirements”

 

I disagree with this assertion, Alexios. The NTIA SBOM framing document 
provides guidance with regard to missing data:

 

SBOMs must gracefully handle cases of missing or non-applicable attributes. A 
basic

recommendation is to always provide all of the baseline attributes but 
explicitly define values

that differentiate between “no assertion” (i.e., data is missing), and “no 
value” (i.e., the attribute

is not applicable for this specific SBOM). Alternatively, an SBOM format can 
permit missing

baseline attributes and treat them as default values (i.e., “no assertion” or 
“no value”).

 

 

Thanks,

 

Dick Brooks

  

Active Member of the CISA Critical Manufacturing Sector, 

Sector Coordinating Council – A Public-Private Partnership

 

 <https://reliableenergyanalytics.com/products> Never trust software, always 
verify and report! ™

 <http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com/> 
http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com

Email:  <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]

Tel: +1 978-696-1788

 

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Eliot 
Lear
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 9:33 AM
To: Alexios Zavras <[email protected]>; Gary O'Neall 
<[email protected]>; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; 'SPDX Technical Mailing List' 
<[email protected]>; 'Emrick Donadei' <[email protected]>; 'Tyler 
Pirtle' <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [spdx-tech] NOASSERTION on PackageVersion field

 

So I know the following is the case:

On 21.08.23 12:05, Alexios Zavras wrote:

Regardless of this, I hope that we all agree that having a value of NOASSERTION 
as packageVersion means that the SBOM including this does NOT meet NTIA’s 
minimum requirements.

I do wonder if people will get around this by simply Making Stuff Up.  Not 
suggesting that as an approach, mind you.

Eliot





-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#5313): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/5313
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/100823660/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to