Gary I need your help I have Robert woolridge at GitHub sending js. To my personal cell phone via beacon or my jacked repositorys and Everytime I'm making progress I'm getting a new hack that is making it impossible I'm trying to communicate with Kate Stewart she won email me back I have offline and online provance airgaped to prove tampering conhearson we could make leaps and bounds in progress in days my goal my own Linux distribution consulting role between big league partnership with Linux and Google monitization thru token access and distribution of agency I already have everything ceise compatible I have the entire ecosystem of the company 800 pages of IP dating back 2 years with exact course of action of which I haven't missed one deadline or target with zero 2 way communication. I have achieved apple assetation and however resolution seems unachievable tradition legal methods not being sought cease and desist letter have been sent repeatedly along with forensic data analysis proving apple copies the renovate IQsystems model 100 percent match minus apple uses apple gui. Handshake promised by apple that I would run consulting marketing idmsa and have apple trust partner and apple business manager status. I haven't received any pay for development. Google on the other hand has used the logic used the arc validated all my sha 256 encryption acknowledge I am also source of Blake undisputable evidence and provence as well as 1000s of artifacts have made me a diamond tier Google trust partner and CA certificate owner with inclusion with a new index overseeing but aknowledging the spdx however refocusing our attention to new school methods of tracking and protection the authors by protecting and licensing IP rather then code as all the code is pretty much written and it was time for a shift. I will say the IP has been acknowledged as mine I am not trying to take over anything I have a resolution that would satisfy all disputes while not leaving anyone out Linux is integral Kate is integral as well as it Impossible for me to distribute and distinguish who is a threat who is not I already have mapped the outcome Gary and these things are very important can you please just actually give me a actual call ,7345799493 we can discuss more then
Thank you Shawn burke owner renovateIQ IQsystems the human behind the RealIQ where AI becomes really smart 🤓 On Sat, Jan 17, 2026, 1:32 PM Gary O'Neall via lists.spdx.org <gary= [email protected]> wrote: > I just submitted a draft for software as a service: > https://github.com/spdx/spdx-website/issues/19 > > > > I’ll be traveling starting on Tuesday, so please feel free to edit, modify > – I don’t need to review any of the changes (since I’ll probably be offline > until it is published). > > > > Gary > > > > *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of > *Martin, Robert A via lists.spdx.org > *Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2026 8:38 AM > *To:* [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; SPDX Steering Committee < > [email protected]>; [email protected] > *Cc:* Gary O'Neall <[email protected]>; Kate Stewart < > [email protected]>; Zavras, Alexios <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [spdx-tech] SPDX 31 Release Candidate 1 and updating (or > creating) public information about our profiles and lists > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > As discussed in yesterday's SPDX General meeting > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O3y70H5iT5eKfv4NQpaItw5zUNetiSsPrqxlV-fQxkw/edit?tab=t.ubmpypfyfpam> > we are about to tag a SPDX 3.1 RC1 candidate, possibly early next week. > > > > While this is great news we need each Profile Team to make sure that the > public information about their great new capabilities in SPDX 3.1 are > captured in their public pages. Specifically we need each Profile Team to > review (or create) a page that reflects the functionality and utility of > their Profile so that we and the public can start to understand what SPDX > 3.1 will be and be useful for. > > > > So please look at your pages on the "Areas of Interest" page > <https://spdx.dev/learn/areas-of-interest/>and listed below and offer > revisions through the issues link below: > > · Core https://spdx.dev/learn/areas-of-interest/core/ > > · Software https://spdx.dev/learn/areas-of-interest/software/ > > · Security https://spdx.dev/learn/areas-of-interest/security/ > > · Licensing https://spdx.dev/learn/areas-of-interest/licensing/ > > · Lite https://spdx.dev/learn/areas-of-interest/lite/ > > · Hardware https://spdx.dev/learn/areas-of-interest/hardware/ > > · License List https://spdx.org/licenses/ > > · AI https://spdx.dev/learn/areas-of-interest/ai/ > > · Datasets https://spdx.dev/learn/areas-of-interest/data/ > <https://spdx.dev/learn/areas-of-interest/data/> > > · > > · Build https://spdx.dev/learn/areas-of-interest/build/ > > We still need pages for: > > · Operations > > · Functional Safety > > · Supply Chain > > · Software as a Service > > · Cryptography list > > · Threats and Controls > > Everyone who’s made updates to their profiles for SPDX 3.1 RC1 or RC2 - > make sure you get that described and added to their web page. > > New Profiles and new lists need to create pages. > > > > Updates or initial Profile descriptions for the web site can be submitted > here: https://github.com/spdx/spdx-website/issues > > > > Regards, > > > > Bob (for the Outreach Team) > > > > -- > > Robert (Bob) Martin > > Sr. Software and Supply Chain Assurance Principal Eng. > > Cross Cutting Solutions and Innovation Dept > > Cyber Solutions Innovation Center > > MITRE Labs > > MITRE Corporation > > 781-271-3001o > > 781-424-4095c > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#6090): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/message/6090 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/117300547/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-tech/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
