SPDX 3.0 will (if I understand the situation correctly) support an `AdditionRef-` construct - see: https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec/issues/153
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 9:29 PM Peter Monks <[email protected]> wrote: > > G'day everyone, > > I developed an SPDX expression parser, based on the ABNF grammar in annex D > of version 2.3 of the SPDX specification, and I recently came across an > unusual case that gave me pause. Basically someone had put a LicenseRef in > the exception-identifier position: > > GPL-3.0-or-later WITH LicenseRef-Additional-Permission > > Now clearly this is not a valid expression according to the ABNF, but I > wondered if perhaps it, or something like it, should be, or (alternatively) > if there's a good reason it's not allowed? > > Thanks in advance for any insights, > Peter > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1768): https://lists.spdx.org/g/spdx/message/1768 Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/101566951/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/spdx/leave/2655439/21656/1698928721/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
